Two days ago, from my home state, Washington:
The unusual case of an Oak Harbor woman accused of feloniously filling out her daughter’s absentee ballot and signing it was settled with a plea bargain in Island County Superior Court Tuesday.
Notably, the case was one of the rare times in the state that a person has been charged for unlawfully voting, according to elections officials at the Washington Secretary of State’s office.
Elizabeth Reddy, 45, pleaded guilty to the charge of “attempted voting absentee ballot unlawfully,” a gross misdemeanor offense.”
Of course the daughter wanted her to do it. But it just shows how easy it would be to vote for someone else using absentee ballots. Just like this case out of the Smokey Mountain News, 1/17/07:
Ron and Rhonda Bedsaul say they were forced to apply for an absentee ballot and then vote a straight Democratic ticket or be evicted from their trailer park in the Alarka community, according to sworn affidavits taken from the Bedsauls. The complaint has been turned over the N.C. Board of Elections for further investigation.
Groupthink is when groups of people continue to believe false assumptions, though their is ample evidence against their beliefs, usually because they have leaders pushing them in the group to this false conclusion or belief. Sounds just like the push to Vote By Mail here in Washington State.
Anyway, here’s another good report to read called, “Going Postal“, here’s the abstract:
We examine the question of whether or not reducing the costs of voting by conducting elections entirely through the mail rather than at the traditional polling place increases participation. Using election data from Oregon, we examine whether or not elections conducted through the mail increase turnout in both local and statewide elections. Using precinct-level data merged with census data we also examine how postal voting may alter the composition of the electorate. We find that, while all-mail elections tend to produce higher turnout, the most significant increases occur in low stimulus elections, such as local elections or primaries where turnout is usually low. The increase in turnout, however, is not uniform across demographic groups. Voting only by mail is likely to increase turnout among those who are already predisposed to vote, such as those with higher socioeconomic status. Like other administrative reforms designed to make voting easier, postal voting has the potential to increase turnout. However, the expanded pool of voters will be limited most likely to those already inclined to vote but find it inconvenient to go to the polling place. This conclusion is consistent with the growing body of research that suggests that relaxing administrative requirements is not likely to be the panacea for low turnout among the disenfranchised.
Filed under: Uncategorized |