Absentees and Optical Scans, a Combination that Doesn’t Work

Poll workers re-voting for you! 
Poll workers re-voting for You!

Take an optical scan ballot, feed it into an optical scan reader, and if that ballot is incorrectly marked, or undervoted, the machine rejects that ballot. In fact, if you are voting at a poll place, this is a really useful feature, because you will have a chance to fix your own ballot. But, what if your ballot is sent through the mail? Well, first of all, what once was flat, is now folded and it becomes fairly difficult for the optical scan machine to read that ballot. And second, if you undervoted, well too bad. Of course if the intent is clear, someone can just revote how they think you’ve voted, which is happening in San Francisco as I type. However, they’ve also added in the complexity of IRV, which works a lot better at the poll site where voters can self-correct a ballot:

http://www.examiner.com/a-1043279~Only_30_000_ballots_left____.htmlSAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) – Only a few San Francisco measures are still at stake as dozens of vote counters work 16-hour days “remaking” tens of thousands of ballots in hopes of a complete tally by Friday.

According to Elections Department head John Arnzt, even though all precincts have reported, there are still 30,000 ballots that need to be copied and counted under strict new state guidelines.

San Francisco’s ranked-choice voting system has always created problems when voters leave a choice blank. The machine spits the ballot back out and elections workers count the ballot by hand. Arnzt calls that an undervote.

This year, because undervotes are also caused by marking ballots with an inappropriate pen, Secretary of State Debra Bowen is requiring San Francisco election workers to fill out or “remake” a replica ballot by using a leaded pen that can be recognized by an optical scanner.

Advertisements

4 Responses

  1. Here’s something that worries me, as some “progressive” forces aim to spread Vote ByWhat is the impact of mailed absentee ballots on California’s election results?

    How does California handle the counting of absentee by mail ballots, and how does that affect when the official results are reported?

    Are there counties still counting ballots days or weeks after election day?

    We need to think through the problems we are trying to solve, and consider the unintended consequences.

  2. I think you raise many valid questions. And as I’ve been tracking this issue for over a year now, I have to say that the answers to your questions are not encouraging. The push to go to Vote-By Mail is a wrong headed one. It increases the time it takes to count elections, it increases the potential for fraud, and it still uses the same computers that were the recent motivational factor that brought so many progressives out to fight for election integrity.

    If you have time, I’d suggest reading through the pages of my blog, and you will find details that support why I say this. Thanks, btw, for commenting. I get a lot of readers everyday, but very few comments.

  3. […] Absentees and Optical Scans, a Combination that Doesn’t Work […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: