Critics of electronic voting raise two main issues: machines are susceptible to fraud (or hacking) and they are difficult to use.
Fraud problems would not go away if we switched to vote by mail, as Oregon has. Such voting — let’s call it mandatory absentee balloting — takes the voter out of the polling booth and puts him at home or elsewhere, someplace where votes could be sold to the highest bidder. Most of the documented cases of voting fraud in the United States in recent years involve absentee ballots. At the beginning of the last century, voter turnout declined as states adopted secret, in-person balloting, most likely because corrupt politicians stopped buying votes since they couldn’t verify that people were really voting for their candidate.
True, squeaky-clean Oregon has been able to use the vote-by-mail system. But it is not clear that clean elections could be held in places with more rancorous partisan disputes over election rules and vote counting. And mail-in ballots don’t eliminate the problem anyway: losers still have an incentive to claim fraud and try to get a close election result overturned. Public opinion on the integrity of the election process is volatile, and surveys show losers have less confidence in the fairness of the process than winners do.
And then don’t miss this article from Colorado:
http://www.kktv.com/home/headlines/4596462.html, where they are having a great time with 65,000 uncounted absentees and voting machine nightmares. There’s a group, CFVI, Coloradoans for Voting Integrity for more information there. I still get emails from them, but there’s not much online so far.
Filed under: Uncategorized |